Skip to main content

Be Social

Home

LEGALUPDATES.COM

Trusted Resources
X
  • Home
  • OUR TEAM
  • JOBs/Classifieds
  • Training Portal

User account menu

  • Login
  • Search

Bulletins

These exceptions to the Hearsay Evidence Rule can come in handy for investigators.

Ray Hill
10 May 2023
CAB00210

From the Classroom: The Hearsay Evidence Rule, Prior Statements of Witnesses 
By Ray Hill  
Professor Emeritus, Santa Rosa Junior College  

This is the ninth in a series of bulletins covering the California Evidence Code and criminal investigations. This series covers the Hearsay Evidence Rule as it relates to an officer, deputy or investigator giving testimony in court (140 E.C.). 

Have you ever had a victim or witness tell you something during an investigative interview and then recant in court? How about a victim/witness coming to court months later and not being able to remember completely what he/she had told you? 

No worry, the Prior Statements of Witnesses exception to the Hearsay Evidence Rule comes to the rescue!  

Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule 

Once a witness testifies, a person who received or overheard a prior statement can be called to repeat that statement when: 

1) When the prior statement is inconsistent with one’s present testimony. The hearsay statement may be repeated for impeachment purposes and to allow the prior statement to be considered as evidence by the trier of fact (770/1235 E.C.)  

Examples:  

A woman tells an officer she was struck several times by her cohabitant domestic partner. She suffered a broken nose. At trial, she recants her previous statement, testifying instead that she was injured falling down stairs. Due to this inconsistency, the officer could testify to the content of the first statement to be considered as evidence and to discredit the previous testimony. 

Defendant was charged with 13 counts of molesting his three stepchildren. The victims gave detailed and graphic descriptions of the molestations. At trial, all recanted their previous statements. Because of the inconsistencies, their out-of-court statements made to investigators and psychologists were admissible (Peo. v. Carey (1995) 35 Cal. App. 4th 2019). 

Defendant repeatedly kicked and punched a victim who was eight months pregnant. The attack resulted in the death of her fetus. At trial, the victim told the jury that she was the aggressor, had injured herself in an accidental fall and lied to the police and doctors about what had occurred. The victim’s mother, friends, doctors and police officers all testified to her prior statements for the purposes of clarification and impeachment (Peo. v. Brown (1995) 150 Cal. App. 3d 970).  

2) The statement can be used to corroborate or rehabilitate a consistent statement (791/1236 E.C.).  

Examples:  

A witness is unable to remember the full content of a prior statement given to a police officer. Her credibility is questioned by opposing counsel. The officer may testify to what the witness previously told her to “fill in the blanks” and rehabilitate testimony. 

A witness gives “Statement A” to an officer. At trial, the witness testifies to the same facts. The officer is called to the witness stand and also testifies to “Statement A” for corroboration purposes. The objective is to show the statement has not changed from crime scene to courtroom and should be credible. 

Test for Trustworthiness 

The test for trustworthiness for Prior Statements of Witnesses is that all due process and cross-examination rights are afforded during the testimony of both the original declarant and any subsequent witness who testifies. 

Additional Hearsay Exceptions 

There are two additional hearsay exceptions under Prior Statements of Witnesses: 

1) Prior Identification (1238 E.C.): Evidence of an identification statement made by a witness is admissible when the statement concerns the identity of a suspect, the original statement was given when the identification was made fresh in the witness’ memory and the testimony is offered for corroboration, rehabilitation or impeachment. 

Examples:  

During an infield show-up, a witness positively identifies a sexual battery suspect. After arraignment, the suspect flees the jurisdiction and is apprehended nine months later. In the meantime, the suspect’s appearance has changed. At trial, the witness testifies she is “pretty sure” the defendant is the perpetrator, but can't be 100 percent positive. The investigating officer can be called to repeat the previous identification statement to rehabilitate witness testimony. 

During a domestic violence scene, a spouse identifies her husband as the person who struck her. At trial, she recants and states she received the injury during a fight with her sister. An officer could testify that the victim identified the suspect on the night of the offense. 

2) Past Recollection Recorded (1237 E.C.): Writings made by or recorded from a witness can be later introduced as evidence. At the time of the writing or recording, the facts must have been fresh in the witness’ memory, the writing was authored by the witness or recorded under his or her direction, and there is a need to introduce the prior statement for corroboration, rehabilitation or impeachment. 

Examples: 

A victim died in the hospital after the defendant injected amphetamines into her intravenous bag. A witness (hospital roommate) told investigating officers that the defendant had visited the victim the night before her death and appeared to have administered some type of medication. An officer recorded this statement. At trial, due to her weakened physical condition, the witness could not remember what she had told the officers. The officer’s notes of the witness’ past statements were entered as evidence (Peo. v. Brock (1994) 143 Cal. App. 4th 1266). 

A detective testified to notes taken from a witness who overheard a defendant and other gang members make threats to kill police officers (Peo. v. Miller (1996) 46 Cal. App. 4TH 417). Rival gang members gave statements, descriptions and identifications after a shooting. At trial, they recanted their previous statements. Their recorded notes were admissible as evidence (Peo. v. Cuevas (1995) 12 Cal. 4th 252).  

Next Up – The Opinion Evidence Rule (800 E.C.) 

Stay Safe, 

RG 

Read More

P.O.S.T. Certified Law Enforcement recommended by Legal Updates!

TOP Rated training

PETALUMA POLICE DEPARTMENT IS SEEKING LATERAL OFFICERS

PETALUMA PD

TEHEMA COUNTY IS HIRING FOR DEPUTY SHERIFF AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS

 

TehemaDS

 

Home

LEGALUPDATES.COM

Trusted Resources

LEGALUPDATES.COM
1968 S. Coast Highway
Laguna Beach, CA 92651

(877) 266-4003

GENERAL SUPPORT QUESTIONS support@legalupdates.com

Other Departments

Reading Corner

  • Prior Issues
  • Prior Cases
  • Special Updates
  • Bulletins
  • Editorials
  • Memorials
  • FAQs
  • Agency List

Be Social

Resources

  • Donate/Support us
  • Advertise with us
  • Classifieds
  • Honorary Supporters
  • Our Plans
  • White List Us
  • Helpful Links
  • Testimonials

all rights reserved © Copyright protected | legalupdates.com® u.s.r. 6,260.924   | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer & Terms of Use                                                     
Click here to provide Feedback                           

 

  • Home
  • OUR TEAM
  • JOBs/Classifieds
  • Training Portal
  • Login
  • Search

Already have an account? Login Here

Sign up now for free access to this content

Enter your details below and stay ahead of the curve.

We need a little information about you to approve your subscription. We take your privacy seriously. Don’t worry we never share your information with anyone.

NOTE: Only use if your agency is paying for your subscription
Notifications
CAPTCHA

This is to verify you are human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

We take your privacy seriously. As detailed in our Privacy Policy, we do not share your information with anyone. You will be able to update your communication preferences at any time. Please contact Legal Updates if you have any questions or need any assistance.

Login here to access the content

Forgot Password?
We take your privacy seriously. As detailed in our Privacy Policy, we do not share your information with anyone. You will be able to update your communication preferences at any time. Please contact Legal Updates if you have any questions or need any assistance.

We hope you have enjoyed your free trial Professional Membership subscription to Legal Updates. We invite you to continue to receive all our services by upgrading from our Basic to our Professional Membership. You can find a summary of all our plan benefits below. As always, we guarantee full satisfaction and will refund 100% of your payment if you are not satisfied.

Membership Plans

100% SATISFACTION GUARANTEE!

Plan Comparision

BASIC MEMBERSHIP
Complimentary
Limited Access
We still appreciate you!
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP
Full Unlimited Access
$15.00/mo ($180.00/year)
Sale! Only $7.50/ mo. ($90.00/year)
Access to our Website
Access to our Website
Receive Updates and Case Alerts
Receive Updates and Case Alerts
Access our library of prior issues and special updates
Access our library of prior issues and special updates
Search Capability
Search Capability
Ability to post comments
Ability to post comments
Print/download/save material from our site
Print/download/save material from our site
Direct access to our authors
Direct access to our authors
Annual Statutes and Changes in the law update (100+ pages)
Annual Statutes and Changes in the law update (100+ pages)
Annual Miranda Update
Annual Miranda Update
Annual Search & Seizure and Fourth Amendment Update (1000+ pages) Our most comprehensive and popular update! A must have for Judges, prosecutors, and police supervisors
Annual Search & Seizure and Fourth Amendment Update (1000+ pages) Our most comprehensive and popular update! A must have for Judges, prosecutors, and police supervisors
Annual Professional Training Certificate (12 Hours of training in legal updates)*
Annual Professional Training Certificate (12 Hours of training in legal updates)*
KEEP CURRENT PLAN

NEWSLETTER

Enter your email and would like to subscribe to our monthly updates.

Stay informed - subscribe to our newsletter.
CAPTCHA

This is to verify you are human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.