Must You Call for Medical Assistance for a Detainee? If You Don’t, You May Find Yourself on a Limb
A new ruling from the Ninth Circuit brings the Fourth Amendment, timely medical care and qualified immunity into the equation of when a police officer must seek health care for a detainee or arrestee. Not doing so when a solo-crash drive had suffered a stroke delayed medical care that may have prevented lifelong injuries.
The Necessity Defense: Choosing Between the Lesser of Two Evils Is Not as Simple as You Might Think
A lost and thirsty hiker sets three wildfires hoping to attract rescuers. As his food and water ran out and his condition worsened, he set a third. He was ultimately rescued but charged with several crimes. Did his “necessity defense” work? Read more inside to learn more about this rare defense, the trial and the appeals verd
Key Legal Ruling: Forced Entry into Exterior Vehicle Cabinets Now Constitutes Burglary 2nd
Appellate Court upholds a Burglary 2nd conviction for a defendant who forcibly entered exterior, permanently mounted utility truck compartments. This ruling clarifies that breaking into secured areas like these is equivalent to forced entry into a vehicle, even if physically separate from the interior.
Deadly Force, Liability and Negligence Highlight Circuit Court Decision in Nevada Case
Home Page Summary In a split decision from December, the Ninth Circuit drills down on issues of deadly force, qualified immunity, whether a parent can claim loss of relationship after officers shot and killed their adult child. This case provides room for debate on whether the officers opted for deadly force too quickly.
Court Ruling Upholds Traffic Stop Prolongation, Seizure of Vehicle, and Enforcement of Federal Law
In United States v. Steinman, the Ninth Circuit ruled that a traffic stop can be extended when reasonable suspicion of additional criminal activity arises. The Court upheld the seizure of a vehicle based on probable cause and affirmed that state officers can enforce federal law, reversing the district court’s decision to supp
Can a tenant allow entry where the co-tenant fails to expressly consent, but does not object?
Read more about this case concerning consensual entry when a co-resident doesn’t voice an objection. On appeal, the defendant also raised questions about whether the search of his person and surroundings, and the physical opening of his cellphone were constitutional.
California’s Racial Justice Act and a Prosecutor’s Racially Discriminatory Language in Jury Arguments
An NFL star’s 2020 rape conviction was overturned after an appeals court ruled in January that the prosecutor’s arguments to the jury violated the state’s RJA, meant “to eliminate racial bias from California’s criminal justice system.”
Appeals Ruling Highlights “Readily Available” Ammo When Charging Assault with Unloaded Gun
Scenario: Suspect threatens victims with an unloaded gun. Can you charge 245? As usual with the law, the answer is: it depends. A new appeals court ruling discusses how even an unloaded firearm can yield an ADW charge, depending on several factors, including how readily available the ammunition is.
Traffic Stop Refresher: Must You Justify Why You Ordered Someone out of a Vehicle after a Lawful Stop?
There are lots of moving parts during a traffic stop, and the courts continue to weigh in on the details of what passes legal muster. In this case, an appeals court reverses the trial court on whether a driver pulled over for rolling through a stop sign was reasonably ordered out of his vehicle.
What Defines a Home’s Curtilage? An Ill-Advised Search Leads to a Reversal for Defendant in Drug Case
The Ninth Circuit rules that deputies violated the Fourth Amendment when they entered the curtilage of a home without a warrant. The court reversed the conviction of one co-defendant but upheld the conviction of another, a parolee who didn’t live at the home and thus had no standing. Here’s what you need to know.