Miranda v. Arizona was decided in 1966, but it’s far from settled. New facts, circumstances, and rulings continue to shape its meaning. A recent appeal in a death penalty case involving a gang member and multiple shootings raises key issues law enforcement and prosecutors must stay aware of.
In a new social media stalking ruling, an appeals court ruled on whether harassing and threatening public Facebook posts focused on a former girlfriend constituted stalking – even though they were sent to someone other than the victim. The case explores the requirements for a “credible threat” being “directed at a victim
In a ruling this month, the Fourth District examined evidence in a rape case where the defendant used corporal punishment, isolation and threats of God’s retribution to force intercourse with his two daughters. Is a psychological threat of retribution akin to the direct use of force or fear? Read inside to learn more.
This ruling looks at a detention where officers see a gun in the back of a car and handcuff a detainee, but otherwise lack probable cause to arrest him. The court explored whether using handcuffs converts a lawful detention into an illegal de facto arrest. Key context includes safety of the officer and public.
Court looks to 2011 case to determine an officer was not entitled to qualified immunity after shooting a suspect holding a knife to his own neck, even as he approached the officer. Legal Updates provides resources to help you understand previous rulings that raise the specter of potential civil liability on the job.
A new ruling from the Ninth Circuit brings the Fourth Amendment, timely medical care and qualified immunity into the equation of when a police officer must seek health care for a detainee or arrestee. Not doing so when a solo-crash drive had suffered a stroke delayed medical care that may have prevented lifelong injuries.
A lost and thirsty hiker sets three wildfires hoping to attract rescuers. As his food and water ran out and his condition worsened, he set a third. He was ultimately rescued but charged with several crimes. Did his “necessity defense” work? Read more inside to learn more about this rare defense, the trial and the appeals verd
Appellate Court upholds a Burglary 2nd conviction for a defendant who forcibly entered exterior, permanently mounted utility truck compartments. This ruling clarifies that breaking into secured areas like these is equivalent to forced entry into a vehicle, even if physically separate from the interior.
Home Page Summary In a split decision from December, the Ninth Circuit drills down on issues of deadly force, qualified immunity, whether a parent can claim loss of relationship after officers shot and killed their adult child. This case provides room for debate on whether the officers opted for deadly force too quickly.
In United States v. Steinman, the Ninth Circuit ruled that a traffic stop can be extended when reasonable suspicion of additional criminal activity arises. The Court upheld the seizure of a vehicle based on probable cause and affirmed that state officers can enforce federal law, reversing the district court’s decision to supp
