When Does “From” Mean “From?” Court Decision Reaffirms the Meaning of the Word 

CAC00116
CASE LAW
  • Discharging from a vehicle
  • Gun doesn't have to be fired from inside the vehicle (26100 P.C.)

 

RULES

The crime of discharging a firearm or permitting the discharge of a firearm from a vehicle does not require that the gun actually be fired from inside the vehicle (26100 P.C.)  

FACTS

The defendants and the victim engaged in a heated verbal exchange inside a Bakersfield convenience store. While the victim, his girlfriend and two young children were walking away from the store, one of the defendants drove his vehicle into the opposite traffic lane and stopped within 15 to 20 feet of the victims. A co-defendant got out of the vehicle, and while using the open door as a barricade, began firing multiple shots at the victims standing on the sidewalk. Ten expended casings were found on the street at the shooting scene. He then reentered the vehicle and the pair drove away. No one was injured. 

After a 10-day jury trial, the defendant was convicted of willful and malicious discharge of a firearm from a motor vehicle and attempted murder. On the aggregate of all charges, he received a sentence of seven-years-to-life plus 49 years and eight months in prison. He appealed (in part) that 26100 P.C. charge didn’t apply because he was not inside the vehicle when the shooting occurred. 

HELD

The Fifth District Court of Appeal ruled that when a driver stops his vehicle, exits and takes a position to discharge a firearm at a victim, a conviction for 26100 P.C. is proper. “Firing a gun from a motor vehicle is an especially treacherous and cowardly crime. It allows the perpetrator to take the victim by surprise and make a quick escape to avoid apprehension, as illustrated by the facts here,” the ruling stated. The statute wording applies to a shooting from “inside,” “out of” or “near the vehicle,” the justices wrote. 

AUTOR NOTES

This is a straightforward decision. Of note, the court used the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Webster’s Third New International Dictionary and a review of pertinent legislative history to define the word “from.” 

Author Notes

This is a straightforward decision. Of note, the court used the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Webster’s Third New International Dictionary and a review of pertinent legislative history to define the word “from.”