
LAPD’s Special Order No. 45 and Notice 13.5 do not prevent the use of an unintentionally recorded conversation between patrol officers in their patrol vehicle in later disciplinary proceedings, obtained through the vehicle’s “digital in-car video system” (or “DICVS”), where the recording reflects evidence of criminal or egregious misconduct. Penal Code § 632—the eavesdropping statute—and subdivision (d) do not prevent the use of recorded confidential communications in later disciplinary proceedings where the recording are not intentional. The Read More